Maritime Transport Contract Dispute Case​

Wooden gavel resting on a dark surface next to book

​Case Background​

Our firm represented a Hong Kong trading company (Plaintiff) in a bill of lading fraud dispute against an international shipping giant (Defendant).

​Key Difficulties:​​

  • P South Korean buyer took delivery of 516 tons of special steel (valued at USD 308,000) using a copy of the bill of lading.
  • P The Hong Kong trader, still holding the full set of original bills of lading, faced bank deductions.
  • P The involved vessel was about to undergo a change of ownership.

​Our Firm's Strategy:​​

  • Dissected the bill of lading trap: Identified the carrier’s violation of Article 71 of the Maritime Code for delivery without presentation of the original bill of lading.
  • Mapped the fund flow: Demonstrated the trader had paid 100% of the letter of credit amount.
  • Established a transnational evidence chain: Connected Japanese loading port records / South Korean discharge port CCTV / Hong Kong bank slips.
  • Countered the shipowner’s evasion tactic: Exposed the Panama registration loophole (ownership transfer finalized within 3 days of arrest).
  • Pioneered exchange rate loss claims: Converted the USD payment obligation into an interest-bearing RMB-denominated claim.
  • Segregated liability entities: Eliminated unrelated claims, focusing solely on the core loss of goods value.

​Case Outcome:​​

  • Recovered USD 262,000 in full loss: Equivalent to 85% direct recovery of goods value (industry average <40%).
  • Textbook vessel arrest tactic: Pioneered the “Arrest + Registration Freeze” dual-track system.
  • Exchange rate loss precedent: Established the rule applying the interest rate of the payment location (China) to cross-border trade claims.
  • Precedent-setting exchange rate loss ruling: Established the rule applying the interest rate of the payment location to cross-border trade claims.

​This Case Refined Our Firm's Core Competencies:​​

  • Bill of lading fraud detection: Penetrated a three-version bill of lading scam within 72 hours.
  • e Four-nation judicial coordination: Seamlessly integrated evidence from China, Japan, South Korea, and Panama.
  • Art of maritime injunction: Executed precise arrests during the narrow vessel ownership transfer window.
  • • Cross-border loss quantification: Pioneered the RMB interest calculation model for USD receivables.
  • 🟒’± Cross-border loss quantification: Pioneered the RMB interest calculation model for USD receivables.
Table of Contents

Request a Schedule For Free Consultation