Successful Cross-border Labor Dispute – Typical Case​

Wooden gavel resting on a dark surface next to book

Case Background​

We represented an overseas construction project employee (Plaintiff) in a labor dispute against a large Chinese engineering and construction enterprise (Defendant). The Plaintiff was assigned to a project site in a South Asian country in February 2009. No written labor contract was signed. In November 2009, the Defendant unilaterally terminated the relationship. The Plaintiff claimed approximately RMB 400,000+ in total compensation for illegal termination, wage arrears, and overtime pay.

​Core Case Disputes​

1. Disagreement on Labor Relationship Nature

  • Plaintiff’s Claim:​​ A de facto labor relationship existed.
  • Defendant’s Defense:​​ It was a service relationship and the Plaintiff was “illegally employed.”

2. Conflict over Remuneration Standard Recognition

  • Plaintiff:​​ Agreed position was Project Manager, entitled to corresponding salary.
  • Defendant:​​ Only paid according to Civil Engineer standards.

3. Legal Application of Working Hour System

  • Defendant’s Claim:​​ Overseas projects apply an irregular working hour system.
  • Plaintiff’s Rebuttal:​​ The system lacked approval from the labor administration authorities.

4. Legality of Dismissal Dispute

  • Whether the termination procedure complied with Article 39 of the Labor Contract Law.

​Our Representation Strategy​

1. Rigorous Labor Relationship Argumentation

  • Organized an evidence chain: wage payment records, work instruction emails, project appointment documents.
  • Cited Article 1 of the “Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning the Establishment of Labor Relations” to lock in the three essential elements of a de facto labor relationship.

2. Precise Calculation of Wage Arrears

  • Retrieved salary standards for the same position within the same project.
  • Invoked Article 82 of the Labor Contract Law to claim double wage payment for the unsigned contract period.

3. Compliance Verification of Working Hour System

  • Proved the Defendant failed to obtain approval for an irregular working hour system.
  • Argued that overseas projects still adhere to China’s standard working hour system.

4. Illegal Termination Compensation Framework

  • Based on Article 87 of the Labor Contract Law, claimed compensation (2N).

​Case Result​

The court ruled (upholding the arbitration award):

  1. A labor relationship existed between the parties (February 13, 2009 – November 13, 2009).
  2. The Defendant illegally terminated the labor contract and was ordered to pay compensation of RMB 26,482.76.
  3. Wage arrears of RMB 62,482.83 were fully supported.
  4. Double wage payment of RMB 116,551.72 for the unsigned contract period was approved.
  5. Claim for unpaid annual leave wages was dismissed (employment duration less than one year).

​Case Insights​

1. Key Risk Control Points in Cross-border Employment

**Risk Linkage**         **Compliance Requirement**

Contract Signing         Written contract mandatory for overseas work

Working Hour System      Special overseas systems require domestic approval

Termination Procedure    Dismissal notice must meet statutory requirements

2. Evidence Management Standards

  • Retain written records of job appointments and salary confirmations for overseas work.
  • Wage payments must specify itemized details (base salary/overseas allowance).

3. Rigor of Sovereign Law Application

  • Chinese enterprises’ overseas projects remain subject to Chinese labor law jurisdiction.
  • Burden of proof for “illegal employment” defenses rests with the employer.
Table of Contents

Request a Schedule For Free Consultation